Organization of scientific and research activities of higher education students in the context of modern educational technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/2524-1079-2025-10-1-056-063Keywords:
research activity, higher education students, critical thinking, educational technologies, research skills, academic research, professional trainingAbstract
The article explores the theoretical and practical aspects of organizing research activities among higher education students in the context of modern educational technologies. It highlights that research activity is a key mechanism for developing critical thinking, as it involves not only the acquisition of new knowledge but also its verification, systematic analysis, and synthesis. The effectiveness of employing educational technologies such as group discussions, case studies, debates, game-based simulations, and flipped learning in facilitating research work is substantiated. The study analyzes international experience in organizing student research in universities across the USA, Canada, and Western Europe, where particular emphasis is placed on the integration of theory and practice and the use of interactive methods that foster the development of students’own scientific perspectives. The article underscores that research activity plays a crucial role in individualizing the educational process and cultivating students' ability to conduct independent inquiry. It concludes that a well-organized research process is not only an effective means of developing professional competencies but also a vital tool in preparing specialists for lifelong self-directed learning.
References
Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dyadenchuk, A. (2023). Rozkryttya tvorchoho potentsialu zdobuvachiv vyshchoyi osvity pid chas naukovo-doslidnoyi diyalʹnosti. Formation of Competencies of Gifted Individuals in the System of Extracurricular and Higher Education, 236–240. DOI: 10.18372/2786-823.1.17501. [in Ukrainian].
Huber, L. (2009). Warum Forschendes Lernen nötig und möglich ist. In L. Huber, J. Hellmer & F. Schneider (Hrsg.), Forschendes Lernen im Studium. Aktuelle Konzepte und Erfahrungen (p. 9–35). Bielefeld: UVW UniversitätsVerlagWebler.
Lyashchenko, T. O., Hryshunina, M. V., & Pichkur, V. R. (2018). Heymifikatsiya yak odna z innovatsiynykh form navchalʹnoho protsesu. Upravlinnya rozvytkom skladnykh system, 35, 113–123. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Urss_2018_35_16. [in Ukrainian].
MIT Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP). URL: https://urop.mit.edu/.
Mykytyuk, O. M. (2003). Teoriya i praktyka orhanizatsiyi naukovo-doslidnoyi roboty u vyshchykh zakladakh osvity Ukrayiny v XIX st. [Dys. d-ra ped. nauk, Kharkivsʹkyy derzh. pedahohichnyy un-t im. H. S. Skovorody]. [in Ukrainian].
Prokofʹyeva, L. B., & Veylandye, L. V.-V. (2021). Pidhotovka studentiv mahistratury do naukovo-doslidnoyi diyalʹnosti. The 10th International scientific and practical conference “European scientific discussions” (August 15–17, 2021). (pp. 167–170). Potere della ragione Editore, Rome, Italy. [in Ukrainian].
Proshkin, V. V. (2013). Intehratsiya naukovo-doslidnoyi i navchalʹnoyi roboty v universytetsʹkiy pidhotovtsi maybutnikh uchyteliv yak suchasna pedahohichna problema. Pedahohika vyshchoyi ta serednʹoyi shkoly, 37, 374–379. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PVSSh_2013_37_83. [in Ukrainian].
Spitsyn, Ye. S. (2003). Metodyka orhanizatsiyi naukovo-doslidnoyi roboty studentiv u vyshchomu zakladi osvity: navch. posib. dlya stud. vyshch. navch. zakl. Kyivsʹkyy natsionalʹnyy linhvistychnyy un-t. K.: Vydavnychyy tsentr KNLU. [in Ukrainian].
Strutynska, O. V., Torbin, H. M., Umryk, M. A., & Vernydub, R. M. (2021). Digitalization of the educational process for the training of the pre-service teachers. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2879, 179–199.
Turku University Research-Based Learning Model. URL: https://www.utu.fi/en/research.
Downloads
-
pdf (Українська)
Downloads: 7