Definition of Levels of Legal Competence Formation of Future Accounting and Taxation Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31649/2524-1079-2019-4-2-131-141Keywords:
competence approach, legal competence, accounting and tax specialists, level of development of legal competence, assessment of level of developmentAbstract
According to the results of the analysis of scientific works and own experience, in order to evaluate the state of formation of legal competence of future specialists in accounting and taxation, on the basis of scientific substantiation both in theoretical and practical terms, the criteria, indicators and levels of its development are defined. It is proposed to use a three-stage assessment scale (initial, medium and high levels of legal competence formation), which, in our opinion, is relevant to the specificity of the object under study.
Therefore, the initial level of legal competence of future accounting and tax specialists indicates that students have partial legal knowledge and do not know how this knowledge can be used in future professional activity; they do not want to improve their knowledge, their professional level, they have episodic interest in mastering their chosen profession, which is stimulated only by external factors. In the process of learning knowledge is learned formally, the student is not able to work independently, acting on the prompt and unable to explain their actions and the predicted result.
Students who are characterized by an average level of legal competence are characterized by unstable positive motivation, episodic interest in the formation of legal knowledge and skills. This group has the skills to solve typical professional tasks, but they cannot creatively craft material because of a lack of knowledge and skills. Students are aware of the shortcomings of their training and the need for self-improvement, but the motives behind this process are external factors.
Students who demonstrate a high level of legal competence are formed with a strong motivation to acquire legal knowledge, a desire to find non-standard solutions, and independent work skills. They adequately assess their level of readiness, find ways to improve it. They have a conscious understanding of purpose, predicting their actions; they know the real assessment of their capabilities, they have a desire for creativity, the ability to self-analysis and self-esteem.
Further research may be aimed at improving approaches and methods to simplify and automate the process of assessing the future competence of accounting and tax professionals proposed by this technology, in particular by directly testing the computer during and after graduation.
References
Anikina, A. S., & Postnikov, P. G. (2012). Pravovaya kompetentnost kak planiruemyj rezultat professionalnoj podgotovki pedagoga. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka, № 2, 24-28.
Bahrii, V. N. (2012). Kryterii ta rivni sformovanosti profesiinykh umin maibutnikh sotsialnykh pedahohiv. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Khmelnytskoho instytutu sotsialnykh tekhnolohii Universytetu «Ukraina», 6, 10–15.
Dotsenko, N. (2017). Metodolohichni pidkhody shchodo pidhotovky zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity inzhenernykh spetsialnostei v umovakh informatsiino-osvitnoho seredovyshcha. Molodyi vchenyi, 11 (51), 298-301.
Fediienko, V. (2009). Modeli kvalimetrii i porivniannia rivniv navchalnykh dosiahnen studentiv u riznykh otsinochnykh systemakh. (Dys. kand. ped. nauk). Kirovohradskyi sotsialno-pedahohichnyi instytut «Pedahohichna akademiia», Kirovohrad.
Gusakovskij, M. (Red). (2006). Ocenivanie: obrazovatelnye vozmozhnosti: sb. nauch.-metod. statej. Vyp. 4. Minsk: BGU.
Halimov, A. V. (2004). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady pidhotovky maibutnikh ofitseriv-prykordonnykiv do vykhovnoi roboty z osobovym skladom. Khmelnytskyi: Vyd-vo NADSPU.
Hlavatska, A. O. (2013). Kryterii formuvannia pravovoi kompetentnosti maibutnoho vykladacha v protsesi profesiinoi pidhotovky. Pedahohichnyi protses: teoriia i praktyka, Vyp. 4, 34-43.
Huba, A. (2010). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady formuvannia upravlinskoi kultury vchytelia – maibutnoho menedzhera osvity. (Dys. d-ra ped. nauk). Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni H. S. Skovorody, Kharkiv.
Huzii, N. (2007). Katehoriia profesionalizmu v teorii i praktytsi pidhotovky maibutnoho pedahoha. (Dys. d-ra ped. nauk). Natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni M. P. Drahomanova, Kyiv.
Ivanova, S. V. (2010). Kryterii ta pokaznyky rozvytku profesiinoi kompetentnosti vchyteliv biolohii v zakladakh pisliadyplomnoi pedahohichnoi osvity. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ped. nauky, Vyp. 52, 152–156.
Kalickij, E. M., Il'in, M. V., & Sikorskaya, N. M. (2005). Razrabotka sredstv kontrolya uchebnoj deyatelnosti: metod. rekomendacii. Minsk: RIPO.
Klyutova, O. K. (2008). Osnovnye kompetencii specialista po upravleniyu personalom v Velikobritanii i SShA. Srednee professionalnoe obrazovanie, 9, 79–82.
Kovalenko, N. (2008). Formuvannia pravosvidomosti i pravovoi kultury studentiv neiurydychnykh navchalnykh zakladiv. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 1, 53-58.
Kremen, V. (Red). (2008). Entsyklopediia osvity. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Kuznecov, S. A. (2011). Kriterii i pokazateli sformirovannosti socialnopravovoj kompetentnosti budushchego specialista po fizicheskoj kulture i sportu. Pedagogiko-psihologicheskie i mediko-biologicheskie problemy fizicheskoj kultury i sporta, 1(18), 1-6.
Kurlyand, Z. (1992). Formirovanie i razvitie professionalnoj ustojchivosti uchitelya. (Avtoref. dis. d-ra ped. nauk). Odesskij pedagogicheskij institut im. K. D. Ushinskogo, Odessa.
Lazariev, O. V. (2014). Kryterii, pokaznyky ta rivni sformovanosti profesiinoi komunikatyvnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh fakhivtsiv ahrarnoho profiliu. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva, Ch. 1, 211-216.
Luhovska, E. M. (2013). Kryterii otsiniuvannia fakhovoi kompetentnosti tekhnikiv-mekhanikiv ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva. Naukovyi visnyk Donbasu, 1. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvd_2013_1_21.
Maslennikova, K. S. (2009). Kryterii ta rivni sformovanosti profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh ekonomistiv. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Pedahohichni nauky Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy», 2, 94-100.
Myropolska, O. (2010). Formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti fakhivtsiv mytnykh orhaniv v umovakh sluzhbovoi diialnosti. (Avtoref. dys. kand. ped. nauk). Natsionalna akademiia Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy imeni B. Khmelnytskoho, Khmelnytskyi.
Nahorniak, S. (2018). Umovy formuvannia pravosvidomosti studentiv za spetsialnistiu pravoznavstvo u protsesi vykhovnoi roboty koledzhu. (Dys. kand. ped. nauk). Vinnytskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni Mykhaila Kotsiubynskoho, Vinnytsia.
Novykov, A. M. (2010). Metodolohyia nauchnoho іssledovanyia. Moskva: Lybrokom.
Pavliutenkov, Ye. M. (2008). Modeliuvannia v systemi osvity (u skhemakh i tablytsiakh). Kharkiv: Osnova.
Polishchuk, O. (2018). Sutnist ta struktura pravovoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh menedzheriv u vyshchykh ahrarnykh navchalnykh zakladakh. Molod i rynok, 2 (157), 73-80.
Rotar, V. (2014). Kryterii ta pokaznyky pravovoi kompetentnosti fakhivtsia pozhezhnoi bezpeky. Liudynoznavchi studii. Pedahohika, Vyp. 29, 179-187.
Rzhevska, N. V. (2016). Kryterii ta pokaznyky sformovanosti pravovoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh bakalavriv iz pidpryiemnytstva, torhivli ta birzhovoi diialnosti. Pedahohichni nauky. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats, Vyp. LXXIV, 3, 96-99.
Shtymak, A. (2015). Tekhnolohiia vyznachennia rivnia kompetentnosti vypusknyka VNZ z vykorystanniam alhorytmiv nechitkoho lohichnoho vyvedennia. Visnyk NU «Lvivska politekhnika». Kompiuterni nauky ta informatsiini tekhnolohii, 826, 109-122. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VNULPKNIT_2015_826_18.
Sytianin, V. (2010). Formuvannia pravovoi kompetentnosti naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv vyshchoi shkoly. (Avtoref. dys. kand. ped. nauk). Derzhavnyi vyshchyi navchalnyi zaklad «Universytet menedzhmentu osvity» NAPN Ukrainy, Kyiv.
Ternopilska, V. I., & Derevianko, O. V. (2012). Vyznachennia kryteriiv sformovanosti profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh hirnychykh inzheneriv. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni N. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 5. Pedahohichni nauky: realii ta perspektyvy, 31, 264-267.
Vvedenskij, V. N. (2003). Modelirovanie professionalnoj kompetentnosti pedagoga. Pedagogika, 10, 51-55.
Yavorska, N. V. (2017). Formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh yurystiv u konteksti standartyzatsii. Visnyk universytetu imeni Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia «Pedahohika i psykholohiia». Pedahohichni nauky, 2(14), 223-228.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 421
